Academic Discussion
·Animal Testing
Level Up Your Academic Writing
Your path to improvement
Want to excel in academic discussions? Our expert guides cover everything from building strong arguments to engaging effectively with other perspectives.
Academic Discussion Guide
Strategies to excel in the academic discussion task
TOEFL Writing Templates
Effective templates and phrases for TOEFL writing
Common Grammar Mistakes
Top grammar errors that hurt your TOEFL score
Estimated TOEFL · Writing
Key Takeaway
The response effectively argues for the justification of animal testing, showing some understanding of the topic.
Noticeable grammatical errorsCritical
“As a pharmacist, I know that this kind of expirements is necessary for certain medications.”
Fix·As a pharmacist, I know that this kind of experiments is necessary for certain medications.
Lacks deeper engagement with classmates' ideasModerate
“I can understand student 2's point of view. However, I do not think that it is scientifically supported.”
Fix·Provide specific reasons or evidence why student 2's view lacks scientific support, such as citing studies or expert opinions.
“I can understand student 2's point of view.”
Acknowledging opposing views demonstrates an understanding of the complexity of the issue, which is important for a well-rounded argument.
“For instance, cancer therapy must be tested on living organisms, otheriwse there will be a lack in the needed information to further develop these therapies.”
Using specific examples like cancer therapy adds credibility to the argument and helps illustrate the necessity of animal testing in certain contexts.
“Consequently, I believe that animal testing is justified when it is irreplaceable, otherwise alternative methods should be considered.”
Concluding with a balanced view shows the ability to weigh different perspectives and propose a nuanced stance, which is valued in academic discussions.
Vocabulary & Flow
Continue using a variety of linking words to enhance the flow and coherence of the response.
Grammar Corrections
1 items foundSpelling error
Suggested Academic Phrases
Improvement Roadmap
Engage more deeply with classmates' arguments by providing specific counterarguments or supporting evidence.
Now: I can understand student 2's point of view. However, I do not think that it is scientifically supported.
Try: While student 2 argues against animal testing, studies show that certain drugs require animal testing to ensure human safety.
Improving engagement with classmates' ideas can significantly enhance the response's depth and relevance.Correct spelling and grammatical errors to improve clarity.
Where: body
Try: Correct 'expirements' to 'experiments'.
Use synonyms to reduce repetition and enhance vocabulary.
Try: Replace 'testing' with 'trials' or 'assessment' where appropriate.