Skip to main content
Back to all posts
TOEFL Tips

Mastering the Academic Discussion Task: Complete TOEFL 2026 Guide

The Academic Discussion task is the most challenging part of the TOEFL 2026 writing section. In just 10 minutes, you must read a professor's question, engage with two student responses, and write a compelling 100-150 word argument. Here's how to score 5/5 every time. For a complete overview of all three tasks, see our TOEFL writing templates guide. (See the visual summary infographic at the end for a quick reference.)

Writing30 Team
10 min read
Mastering the Academic Discussion Task Infographic: Complete TOEFL 2026 Guide showing 10 min Time Limit, 100+ Minimum Words, and 3 Voices to Read (Professor + 2 Students). Learn to engage with peers and express your opinion effectively.
Academic Discussion Task: 10 Minutes, 100+ Words, 3 Voices to Engage With
10 min
Time Limit
100+
Minimum Words
0-5
Score Range
3
Voices to Read

Watch: Academic Discussion Task Explained

Official overview of the TOEFL iBT writing section and what to expect

What is the Academic Discussion Task?

The Academic Discussion task simulates participating in an online university course discussion. You'll see a professor's question followed by two student responses—then write your own contribution expressing your opinion and engaging with your classmates.

What You'll See on Screen

1. Professor's Question

A question or prompt inviting student opinions (2-4 sentences)

2. Student A's Response (Claire)

One student's position with reasoning (2-4 sentences)

3. Student B's Response (Andrew)

Often a contrasting position with different reasoning (2-4 sentences)

4. Your Task

Write 100+ words expressing and supporting your opinion while engaging with your peers

Key Requirement

You must engage with at least one peer response. Simply stating your opinion without acknowledging what Claire or Andrew said will result in a lower score (typically 3 or below).

The Perfect Academic Discussion Response Structure

High-scoring responses follow a consistent 5-part structure that ensures you hit every scoring criterion. Here's the optimal organization:

1

Position + Peer Acknowledgment (1-2 sentences)

State your position clearly while referencing a peer's point. This shows you read the discussion.

"While I understand Andrew's concern about limited free time, I believe mandatory volunteer hours would benefit high school students."

2

Primary Supporting Reason (2-3 sentences)

Develop your main argument with explanation and reasoning.

"Volunteering teaches students empathy and community responsibility—skills that are difficult to learn in a classroom. When students help others, they develop a broader perspective on society's challenges."

3

Secondary Point or Example (1-2 sentences)

Add depth with a concrete example, counterargument response, or additional benefit.

"Schools could offer flexible volunteer options—weekend projects or summer programs—to accommodate students with part-time jobs or family responsibilities."

4

Concrete Example (1 sentence, optional)

A specific illustration strengthens your argument.

"For example, helping at a local food bank teaches both organizational skills and compassion for those facing food insecurity."

5

Conclusion (1 sentence)

Reinforce your position with a synthesis or forward-looking statement.

"In conclusion, while scheduling concerns are valid, the long-term benefits of mandatory volunteering far outweigh these temporary challenges."

Word Count Distribution (~130 words total)

Part 1
~25 words
Part 2
~45 words
Part 3
~30 words
Part 4
~15 words
Part 5
~15 words

Academic Discussion Template (Copy & Adapt)

Universal Template

[Part 1] While I understand [Student Name]'s point about [their concern], I believe [your position].

[Part 2] [Main reason/argument]. This is important because [explanation]. Additionally, [supporting detail].

[Part 3] Furthermore, [address counterargument or add second point].

[Part 4] For example, [concrete example].

[Part 5] In conclusion, [restate position with synthesis].

Alternative Opening Patterns

Agreement with Student A:

"I agree with Claire that [their point]. In my view, [your position]..."

Disagreement with Both:

"While both Claire and Andrew make valid points, I believe they're overlooking [your unique angle]..."

Partial Agreement:

"Andrew raises important concerns about [issue], but I think [your nuanced position]..."

Building on a Point:

"Claire makes an excellent point about [their idea]. I'd like to add that [your extension]..."

Full Example with Detailed Analysis

The Discussion Thread

Dr. Achebe (Professor):

"Volunteerism refers to offering your time and service without financial compensation to benefit a community or cause. While many volunteer to help others, some institutions have mandatory volunteer programs. Should high school students be required to do volunteer work? Why or why not?"

Claire:

"Yes, I think high schools should require volunteer hours because it helps students build civic responsibility. Many teenagers don't naturally think about helping others, and this requirement can introduce them to the idea that their time can make a real difference in others' lives."

Andrew:

"I don't think volunteer hours should be required because many students already have limited free time. Some have part-time jobs or take care of younger siblings after school. Adding a mandatory requirement could create extra stress and make it harder for those students to balance their responsibilities."

Score 5 Response (145 words)

While I get Andrew's point about limited free time,I think it's good to have mandatory volunteer hours at high schools.

Volunteering teaches students empathy and community service, helping them grow into responsible adults.Schools can give flexible options that fit a student's schedule, like weekend or summer volunteering.

What's more, volunteering can be a break from academic pressure, allowing students to engage in meaningful activities outside school.

For example, helping at a community garden is both fulfilling and educational.

In conclusion, while Andrew raises valid concerns about time constraints, I think the benefits of volunteering outweigh those concerns. Schools should offer flexible volunteer options to help students develop into caring, socially conscious individuals.

CriteriaHow This Response Achieves It
Clear PositionOpens with clear stance: "I think it's good to have mandatory volunteer hours"
Peer EngagementReferences Andrew twice: opening acknowledgment + conclusion response
Multiple ReasonsProvides 3 benefits: empathy, flexible scheduling solution, stress relief
Concrete ExampleCommunity garden example adds specificity
Strong ConclusionSynthesizes argument and offers solution
GrammarConsistent accuracy with varied sentence structures

Grammar errors can significantly impact your score. Review our guide on 10 grammar mistakes that cost you points to avoid common errors in your Academic Discussion response.

Official TOEFL Academic Discussion Scoring Rubric

This is the official ETS scoring rubric used to evaluate Academic Discussion responses. Understanding these criteria helps you know exactly what evaluators look for:

5A Fully Successful Response

The response is a relevant and very clearly expressed contribution to the online discussion, and it demonstrates consistent facility in the use of language.

A typical response displays:

  • Relevant and well-elaborated explanations, exemplifications, and/or details
  • Effective use of a variety of syntactic structures and precise, idiomatic word choice
  • Almost no lexical or grammatical errors other than those expected from a competent writer under timed conditions (e.g., common typos or there/their)
4A Generally Successful Response

The response is a relevant contribution to the online discussion, and facility in the use of language allows the writer's ideas to be easily understood.

A typical response displays:

  • Relevant and adequately elaborated explanations, exemplifications, and/or details
  • • A variety of syntactic structures and appropriate word choice
  • Few lexical or grammatical errors
3A Partially Successful Response

The response is a mostly relevant and mostly understandable contribution to the online discussion, and there is some facility in the use of language.

A typical response displays:

  • • Elaboration in which part of an explanation, example or detail may be missing, unclear or irrelevant
  • Some variety in syntactic structures and a range of vocabulary
  • Some noticeable lexical and grammatical errors in sentence structure, word form or use of idiomatic language
2A Mostly Unsuccessful Response

The response reflects an attempt to contribute to the online discussion, but limitations in the use of language may make ideas hard to follow.

A typical response displays:

  • • Ideas that may be poorly elaborated or only partially relevant
  • • A limited range of syntactic structures and vocabulary
  • • An accumulation of errors in sentence structure, word forms or use
1An Unsuccessful Response

The response reflects an ineffective attempt to contribute to the online discussion, and limitations in the use of language may prevent the expression of ideas.

A typical response displays:

  • • Words and phrases that indicate an attempt to address the task, but with few or no coherent ideas
  • Severely limited range of syntactic structures and vocabulary
  • Serious and frequent errors in the use of language
  • Minimal original language; any coherent language is mostly borrowed from the stimulus
0No Credit

The response is blank, rejects the topic, is not in English, is entirely copied from the prompt, is entirely unconnected to the prompt, or consists of arbitrary keystrokes.

Source: Official ETS TOEFL iBT Writing Scoring Guide (2025). For the complete scoring guide including Write an Email, see our TOEFL 2026 Scoring Guide.

Top 10 Tips for Scoring 5 on Academic Discussion

Students engaged in academic discussion around a table with laptops and notes, practicing collaborative learning and discussion skills

Practice engaging in discussions to build confidence for the Academic Discussion task

Photo by Brooke Cagle on Unsplash
1

State your position in sentence 1

Don't bury your opinion. Start with a clear stance.

2

Always mention a peer by name

Say 'Andrew' or 'Claire' to show you read their responses.

3

Write at least 120 words

100 is the minimum; 120-150 gives room to develop ideas fully.

4

Give 2-3 supporting reasons

One reason isn't enough. Show depth of thinking.

5

Include a specific example

Concrete examples make abstract arguments convincing.

6

Address counterarguments

Acknowledge opposing views, then explain why you disagree.

7

Use transition words

Furthermore, however, in addition, for example, in conclusion.

8

End with a synthesis

Don't just repeat—combine ideas into a final insight.

9

Leave 1-2 minutes to review

Catch grammar errors and check you addressed all parts.

10

Practice timed responses

10 minutes is short. Practice until the structure is automatic.

Useful Phrases & Transitions for Academic Discussion

Agreeing with Peers

  • • I agree with [Name] that...
  • • [Name] makes an excellent point about...
  • • Like [Name], I believe...
  • • Building on [Name]'s idea...
  • • [Name] is right to point out that...

Disagreeing Politely

  • • While I understand [Name]'s concern...
  • • Although [Name] raises valid points...
  • • I see [Name]'s perspective, but...
  • • Unlike [Name], I think...
  • • [Name]'s argument overlooks...

Adding Support

  • • Furthermore,...
  • • What's more,...
  • • Additionally,...
  • • Another important point is...
  • • This is because...

Concluding

  • • In conclusion,...
  • • Overall,...
  • • For these reasons,...
  • • Therefore,...
  • • To sum up,...

Frequently Asked Questions

How many words should I write for the Academic Discussion task?

Write at least 100 words, but 120-150 words is optimal. Going below 100 typically results in a score of 3 or lower because you can't fully develop your argument in fewer words.

Do I need to mention both students?

Mentioning at least one student is required for high scores. Engaging with both Claire and Andrew demonstrates careful reading and can boost your score, but it's not strictly required.

What if I agree with both students?

You can take a middle position, but you still need to add something new. Try: "Both Claire and Andrew make valid points. However, I think the key factor they're missing is..."

How do I manage time in 10 minutes?

1-2 min: Read prompt and responses carefully
6-7 min: Write your response using the template
1-2 min: Review for errors and word count

Visual Summary: Academic Discussion Task at a Glance

Save or bookmark this infographic for quick reference when practicing. It summarizes all the key points covered in this guide—time limits, word counts, response structure, and scoring criteria.

Academic Discussion Task Visual Summary: Complete TOEFL 2026 Guide showing 10 min Time Limit, 100+ Minimum Words, 3 Voices to Read (Professor + 2 Students), 5-part response structure, and scoring rubric overview
Complete Visual Guide: Everything you need to know about the Academic Discussion task in one image

Practice Academic Discussion Now

Get instant AI feedback on your Academic Discussion responses.

Try Practice

References & Further Reading

  1. TOEFL iBT Writing SectionETS Official Website (Accessed: December 2025)
  2. TOEFL iBT Writing Scoring GuideETS TOEFL Preparation (Accessed: December 2025)
  3. TOEFL iBT Test Content and StructureETS Official Website (Accessed: December 2025)
  4. TOEFL iBT Free Practice TestETS Free Resources (Accessed: December 2025)
  5. Understanding TOEFL iBT ScoresETS Score Users Guide (Accessed: December 2025)

External links open in a new tab. Writing30 is not affiliated with the linked sources.

Tags

toefl writing practiceacademic discussiontoefl 2026toefl writing rubrictoefl writing examplestoefl writing tips